
I have already done a number of trainings, but this one really pleased me. The topics were general, the responsibility of the designer, the technologist, hardening, tempering in a protective atmosphere and in a vacuum, sub-zero treatment, carburizing and carbonitriding, nitriding and nitrocarburizing and others.
Were your expectations met in terms of content?
Is it possible for you to apply the content of the training?
How would you rate the lecturer’s expertise and professionalism?
How do you rate the teaching skills, the form of leadership (techniques, methods)?
How open was the lecturer and his willingness to discuss?
Positive impressions: What did you like? What interested you? What pleasantly surprised you? What will you use most in practice?
Negative impressions: What disappointed you? What did not meet your expectations? What did you miss? What is your recommendation for improvement?
What is your overall impression of the training?
What is important to me is to present a view that corresponds to real life in heat treatment. It’s nice to lecture a designer about the forces that move the carbon atoms between two crystals, but he will never need it in practice.
As one of my great teachers, Dr. Wolf Dieter Munz, who worked for Leybold at the time, once said:
We’re here to make it work, and scientists are here to investigate why.
Jiří Stanislav
May 29, 2023